Skip to content

Review regexes in library for compatibility with JS #3075

Description

@Luna712

Describe your suggested feature

Some regex may compile, but not actually fully work the same in JS, we should probably review this to ensure the same behavior and maybe add some tests before we add #3069 target or really before we need to do #3069. I am aware some regexes are definitely incompatible but I can't remember which ones as well. Though @fire-light42 opinion on if we should very carefully review this beforehand or fix it on an as-needed basis as issues are found?

Other details

I made this as a feature request even though it isn't as I can't make a normal issue here.

Acknowledgements

  • My suggestion is NOT about adding a new provider
  • I have searched the existing issues and this is a new ticket, NOT a duplicate or related to another open issue.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions