Warn users before destructive password reset#568
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughTwo password reset components are updated: PasswordResetRequestForm adds an AlertDialog confirmation that gates reset initiation and moves reset logic into a new async helper; PasswordResetConfirmForm adds a 30s timer that shows an informational Alert when a reset code hasn't arrived. ChangesPassword Reset Flow Enhancement
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant RequestForm as PasswordResetRequestForm
participant OS as os.requestPasswordReset
participant ConfirmForm as PasswordResetConfirmForm
RequestForm->>OS: requestPasswordReset(hashedSecret, email)
OS-->>RequestForm: success / failure
RequestForm->>ConfirmForm: showConfirmForm + secret
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~40 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
Deploying maple with
|
| Latest commit: |
4f7ce9c
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://191ffa5b.maple-ca8.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://aead-password-reset-warning.maple-ca8.pages.dev |
|
What I’d still test, in priority order:
The highest-value remaining checks are guest, password reset/change on the deployed dev stack, and a restart/failover smoke. |
QA Testing Results — PR #568 (aead-password-reset-warning)Tester: MarkEnvironment: Dev (Cloudflare instance)Date: 2026-06-13
Verdict: Core auth and encryption flows (Steps 1, 3, 4) all pass. The new password reset warning UX works as intended. Ready from a functional QA perspective on the tested flows. I am unable to test 2, 5, and 6. For number 2, I didn't have an existing anon account from before the migration. For number 7, I will try running a separate proxy where I can swap out the backend URL and test API access in the dev instance. |
Summary
Testing
Summary by CodeRabbit