Skip to content

feat(node): use morph da codec decoder#1012

Open
curryxbo wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
feat/morph-da-codec-decoder
Open

feat(node): use morph da codec decoder#1012
curryxbo wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
feat/morph-da-codec-decoder

Conversation

@curryxbo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Integrate github.com/morph-l2/morph-da-codec/bindings/decoder/zstd for node batch decompression.
  • Remove legacy libscroll_zstd_* cgo link declarations to avoid linking duplicate Rust static libraries.
  • Keep test payload compression compatible by producing zstd payloads without magic bytes.

Test plan

  • CGO_ENABLED=1 go test ./zstd
  • CGO_ENABLED=1 go test ./derivation
  • CGO_ENABLED=1 go test ./... -run '^$'

Related issue: #1011

Made with Cursor

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@curryxbo, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 40 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: d12df12e-0a4d-4423-b378-bafb5c1e7c6d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 60a7515 and 8e1516e.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • common/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
  • go.work.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
  • common/batch/blob.go
  • common/blob/payload.go
  • common/codec/zstd/codec.go
  • common/codec/zstd/codec_test.go
  • common/go.mod
  • node/derivation/batch_info.go
  • node/derivation/batch_info_test.go
  • node/go.mod
  • node/zstd/codec.go
  • node/zstd/codec_test.go
  • node/zstd/libscroll_zstd_darwin_arm64.a
  • node/zstd/libscroll_zstd_darwin_arm64.go
  • node/zstd/libscroll_zstd_linux_amd64.a
  • node/zstd/libscroll_zstd_linux_amd64.go
  • node/zstd/libscroll_zstd_linux_arm64.a
  • node/zstd/libscroll_zstd_linux_arm64.go
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/morph-da-codec-decoder

Warning

Billing warning: we have not been able to collect payment for this subscription for more than 72 hours. Please update the payment method or pay any pending invoices in Billing to avoid service interruption.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

corey and others added 3 commits July 3, 2026 10:34
@curryxbo
curryxbo marked this pull request as ready for review July 17, 2026 07:57
@curryxbo
curryxbo requested a review from a team as a code owner July 17, 2026 07:58
@curryxbo
curryxbo requested review from twcctop and removed request for a team July 17, 2026 07:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants