docs(adr): add AI workflow and SDD decision records#342
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 1 hour. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
WalkthroughThis PR introduces two new architecture decision records (ADR-0013 and ADR-0014) that formalize the project's AI-assisted development workflow using Claude Code and a spec-driven development process. Supporting documentation is updated to reference these architectural decisions across the changelog, root documentation, and ADR index. ChangesArchitecture Decision Records for AI-Assisted Development
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #342 +/- ##
===========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
Complexity 32 32
===========================================
Files 3 3
Lines 90 90
Branches 8 8
===========================================
Hits 90 90 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)
46-47: 💤 Low valueConsider adding issue reference for consistency.
The original ADR batch entry (line 45) includes an issue reference
(#299), but the new ADR entries don't reference this PR (#342). While not strictly required for documentation changes, adding the reference maintains traceability and follows the established pattern in this file.📝 Suggested addition
-- ADR-0013: Adopt AI-Assisted Development Workflow -- ADR-0014: Adopt Spec-Driven Development (SDD) +- ADR-0013: Adopt AI-Assisted Development Workflow (`#342`) +- ADR-0014: Adopt Spec-Driven Development (SDD) (`#342`)🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@CHANGELOG.md` around lines 46 - 47, Add the PR reference to the two new ADR lines so they match the established pattern: update the ADR entries "ADR-0013: Adopt AI-Assisted Development Workflow" and "ADR-0014: Adopt Spec-Driven Development (SDD)" to include the PR number in parentheses (e.g. " (`#342`)") at the end of each line, preserving the existing formatting and punctuation used by the earlier ADR entry.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/adr/0013-ai-assisted-development-workflow.md`:
- Line 53: Add a single blank line immediately after each subsection heading
"### Positive", "### Negative", and "### Neutral" so the headings are followed
by a blank line (fixes MD022); locate the three heading occurrences in the ADR
(the ones labelled "### Positive", "### Negative", "### Neutral") and insert one
empty line after each heading to satisfy markdownlint.
In `@docs/adr/0014-spec-driven-development.md`:
- Line 40: Add a blank line immediately after each subsection heading to satisfy
MD022: insert an empty line after the "### Positive", "### Negative", and "###
Neutral" headings in the ADR (these exact heading strings appear in the diff) so
the headings are followed by a blank line; also apply the same fix for the other
occurrences noted (the headings referenced at lines 48 and 54 in the review) to
ensure consistent Markdown compliance.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@CHANGELOG.md`:
- Around line 46-47: Add the PR reference to the two new ADR lines so they match
the established pattern: update the ADR entries "ADR-0013: Adopt AI-Assisted
Development Workflow" and "ADR-0014: Adopt Spec-Driven Development (SDD)" to
include the PR number in parentheses (e.g. " (`#342`)") at the end of each line,
preserving the existing formatting and punctuation used by the earlier ADR
entry.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 9c644d19-ca78-43b2-82ab-71d95013077c
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
CHANGELOG.mdCLAUDE.mddocs/adr/0013-ai-assisted-development-workflow.mddocs/adr/0014-spec-driven-development.mddocs/adr/README.md
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
1 participant
Summary
CLAUDE.mdas the workflow specificationdocs/adr/README.mdindex,CHANGELOG.md, andCLAUDE.mdADR count (12 → 14)Test plan
docs/adr/README.mdresolve to the new files🤖 Generated with Claude Code
This change is
Summary by CodeRabbit