Skip to content

go.mod: bump app-store to the proc.exec version#317

Open
Alexgodoroja wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bump-app-store-proc-exec
Open

go.mod: bump app-store to the proc.exec version#317
Alexgodoroja wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bump-app-store-proc-exec

Conversation

@Alexgodoroja

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Repoints the pinned github.com/pilot-protocol/app-store dependency to the commit that adds the proc.exec capability, so the daemon's manifest validation accepts CLI apps (which ship a proc.exec grant scoped to one command). Without the bump, the deployed daemon validates against a capability vocabulary that lacks proc.exec and rejects them.

Depends on pilot-protocol/app-store#24; re-pin to the merged SHA once it lands.

Footprint: zero business logic

This is deliberately a dependency-pointer + test change only. The proc.exec logic lives entirely in the app-store dependency — pilotctl/supervisor already delegate validation to app-store's manifest.Validate(), so nothing in this repo duplicates or implements capability logic. Diff is go.mod + go.sum + one test.

Test

cmd/pilotctl regression test asserting a proc.exec manifest validates against the pinned app-store (and that a wildcard * target is still rejected by the hardened validator).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Repoint the pinned app-store dependency to the commit that adds the proc.exec
capability, so the daemon's manifest validation accepts CLI apps (which ship a
proc.exec grant scoped to one command). Without the bump, the deployed daemon
validates against a capability vocabulary that lacks proc.exec and rejects them.

No daemon code changes: pilotctl/supervisor already delegate validation to
app-store's manifest.Validate(). Adds a regression test asserting a proc.exec
manifest validates (and that a wildcard target is still rejected).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant