Skip to content

Refactor getReplicationInfo with object parameters#6231

Closed
SylvainSenechal wants to merge 1 commit into
development/9.4from
improvement/CLDSRV-950
Closed

Refactor getReplicationInfo with object parameters#6231
SylvainSenechal wants to merge 1 commit into
development/9.4from
improvement/CLDSRV-950

Conversation

@SylvainSenechal

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Issue: CLDSRV-950

Refactor getReplicationInfo with object parameters
Not super useful but we said we would do it during the crr cascade so here we are

@bert-e

bert-e commented Jul 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello sylvainsenechal,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@SylvainSenechal
SylvainSenechal changed the base branch from development/9.3 to development/9.4 July 21, 2026 18:21
@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Jul 21, 2026
@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Jul 21, 2026
@bert-e

bert-e commented Jul 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • 2 peers

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

❌ 2 Tests Failed:

Tests completed Failed Passed Skipped
9695 2 9693 0
View the top 1 failed test(s) by shortest run time
"after each" hook for "should fail if trying to overwrite a delete marker"::MPU with x-scal-s3-version-id header With v4 signature "after each" hook for "should fail if trying to overwrite a delete marker"
Stack Traces | 0.016s run time
We encountered an internal error. Please try again.
View the full list of 1 ❄️ flaky test(s)
"after each" hook for "should fail if trying to overwrite a delete marker"::MPU with x-scal-s3-version-id header With default signature "after each" hook for "should fail if trying to overwrite a delete marker"

Flake rate in main: 90.12% (Passed 24 times, Failed 219 times)

Stack Traces | 0.015s run time
We encountered an internal error. Please try again.

To view more test analytics, go to the Test Analytics Dashboard
📋 Got 3 mins? Take this short survey to help us improve Test Analytics.

@SylvainSenechal

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

messed up pr because i used base 9.3 first

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants